
I generally avoid blockbuster shows, and wasn’t planning to be one of the over 660,000 people who squeezed their way through the wildly popular McQueen “retrospective” Savage Beauty at the Metropolitan Museum of Art when I visited New York a couple weeks ago.

But someone gave me their friend’s member’s card, so I was able to skip the line first thing in the morning. Perhaps because of this kind of abuse, the Met cruelly revoked all member queue-jumping privileges during the frenzied last days of the show.

A lot of admiring, gushing, worshipping ink has been spilled on Savage Beauty. Since this is supposed to be a westernwear blog, it’s not really the place for an exposition of my problems with it. And after a rough plane ride, a few 8% Duvels and the Wanda Jackson show the night before, in addition to my existing blockbuster bias, I wasn’t feeling very well at all at 8:30am, trudging through miles of freezing air-conditioned halls of masterworks, all closed off to acommodate the lineup.

This bumster skirt was in the first array of garments, from the now-famous “Highland Rape” collection. I didn’t get a look at everything; I wasn’t up to navigating the crowds, and I’m not that tall. I noticed the tailoring was nice on the early things. I wonder if he did some of it himself. I don’t know how much of the sewing he ever did. Maybe it says in the huge show catalogue. (I didn’t buy it)



I stuck to the middle of the crammed galleries and went through, scanning the dresses and installations, hearing other viewers’ commentaries, stopping briefly by a few of the less crowded displays, like the heavily embroidered Asian-inspired capes and dresses from one of his last couture collections, and one of the many incredibly constructed feather dresses. I was disappointed by the almost complete lack of attention to my favorite of all his collections, Fall-Winter 2009.

I’ve written my admiration for this collection in other posts. I think it was a definitive statement on his negative feelings toward the fashion industry, a statement which Savage Beauty chose to ignore.





I headed for the exit, past the three-deep crowd surrounding a little projection of The Kate Moss Hologram, throngs praying at the altar of The Oyster Dress, and the jostling rows ogling The Armadillo Shoes.

The show presented McQueen as a revolutionary individual who realized a powerfully creative vision. Beyond his earthly achievements, however, surely this elevation into sainthood feeds nicely into the marketing of the clothing that continues to bear his name in the aftermath of his suicide.

In contrast, McQueen’s one-time rival and fellow Commander of the British Empire John Galliano, revered for years for his work at Christian Dior, has temporarily exited the fashion world and will not be up for sainthood anytime soon. In fact, he’ll be up before a judge on charges related to public anti-semetic diatribes.

Instead of lionizing his individual genius, upon his dismissal from Dior, emphasis was put on the teamwork that goes into the clothing, under the guidance of the designer. At the end of the show that took place just after Galliano was fired, when the designer takes their customary bow (and Galliano usually paraded his own outfit down the runway too) Dior instead brought out their staff of petite-mains, the legendary Paris seamstresses.

Dior chief executive Sidney Toledano said, “A lot of schools produce designers, but the technical people—this is what we have to protect…They’re sustaining the house.”